Flexible forms of employment create additional opportunities
Flexible forms of employment are above all an expression of increased flexibility requirements in companies. The result of greater regulation would not be more "normal employment relationships", but fewer employment opportunities for all. Flexible forms of employment - above all temporary work - often prove to be a stepping stone to employment, especially for people who have a hard time on the labour market: From May 2018 to April 2019, according to the Federal Employment Agency, every sixth unemployed person who took up employment subject to social security contributions found it in temporary employment. For people who were previously long-term unemployed or had never been employed, as many as one in four took up employment in temporary work.
lowers the barriers to entry, especially for younger people. At the same time, they offer longer-term employment prospects, since almost three quarters of those initially employed on a fixed-term basis obtain a follow-up job. In addition, flexible forms of employment often meet the needs of many employees that deviate from the "normal employment relationship". This is particularly true of part-time work. Part-time work is more often than not taken up by parents for whom a full-time job is often not an option for reconciling work and family life because of the persistent lack of childcare facilities to meet their needs. Ultimately, the aim must be to facilitate transitions between forms of employment and to increase employment opportunities. In its annual report for 2018/2019, the German Council of Economic Experts rightly emphasised once again how important flexible forms of employment are, particularly for people entering the labour market, and that further restrictions on temporary work and
should be avoided.
Do not stigmatise flexible forms of employment as "atypical
It is absurd and defamatory to describe flexible forms of employment as "atypical" or even "precarious". This is intended to create the impression that flexible forms of employment do not in principle provide sufficient income. This is unjustified for various reasons: Fixed-term employment or temporary employment relationships in particular also include demanding activities that are well remunerated and improve the employment prospects of many people. Fixed-term employment relationships are prohibited from being treated less favourably than permanent employees. In the case of mini-jobs, which are limited to a monthly wage of €450, or also in the case of part-time employment with a (often freely chosen) low number of hours, it is in the nature of things that an income from work that covers needs cannot be achieved with this. People who are only marginally employed often have other sources of income or are not looking to work in the primary labour market: over 40% of mini-jobbers are pupils, students and pensioners. Over 35 % are housewives and men who supplement their partner's income with their mini-job. In addition to the collective agreements in the temporary employment sector, which apply to almost 100% of the employment relationships in temporary employment, there are now supplementary collective agreements in twelve sectors which ensure appropriate remuneration. The lower wage limit under the Temporary Employment Act additionally stabilizes the entire industry.
Mini-jobs are more flexible and easier to handle than employment relationships subject to social security contributions, as mini-jobs involve less administrative work. The employer only has to register and account for a mini-job at
and his employers' liability insurance association. The employer has to pay slightly more than 30% flat-rate contributions for marginally employed persons. Thus, the employer's tax burden is even higher for a mini-job than for an employment relationship subject to social insurance. Nevertheless, marginal employment is more economical for covering production peaks and seasonal requirements.