Bda Arbeitgeber Logo InversBda Arbeitgeber LogoBda Arbeitgeber Logo InversBda Arbeitgeber Logo Invers
MENUMENU
  • TOPICS
        • Employment and Labour Market
          • Labour market policy
          • Company personnel policy
          • Equal opportunities
          • Diversity
          • Equal pay
          • Securing skilled labor
          • Flexible employment
          • Women in management positions
          • Refugees
          • Inclusion
          • Standardization
          • Contact person
          • Immigration and integration
        • Labour law and collective bargaining policy
          • General applicability
          • Industrial action
          • Labour & collective bargaining law
          • Working time
          • Time limit
          • Works Constitution
          • Bureaucracy reduction
          • Data protection
          • Protection against discrimination
          • Parental leave
          • Posting
          • Insolvency
          • Protection against dismissal
          • Minimum wage
          • Co-determination
          • Mobile work
          • Maternity protection
          • Pandemic
          • Care time
          • Self-employment
          • Tariff autonomy
          • Collective Bargaining Agreement
          • Collective bargaining unit
          • Tariff policy
          • Collective bargaining
          • Collective agreement
          • Part-time work
          • Restructuring
          • Holiday law
          • Contracts for work
          • Whistleblowing
          • Temporary work
        • Education and vocational training
          • Training market
          • Professional orientation
          • Education policy
          • Education 4.0
          • Dual education
          • dual study
          • Permeability
          • Early childhood education
          • Higher Education Funding
          • Lifelong learning
          • Teacher Education
          • Reorganization of education and training
          • STEM Professionals
          • Economic education
          • Accreditation/Quality assurance
          • SCHOOLBUSINESS Germany
        • Digitalization and innovation
          • Agile working
          • The future of work
        • Europe and International Affairs
          • Occupational safety and health in Europe
          • Contact person
          • European Works Council
          • European legislation
          • European minimum wage
          • European Semester
          • Names

          • Contact person
          • Contact person
          • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
          • Social security in Europe
          • Location Europe
          • Social dialogue
        • Social policy and social security
          • Old-age poverty
          • Work made in Germany
          • Occupational safety
          • Contribution and registration law
          • Company pension scheme
          • Shortage of company doctors
          • Health insurance
          • Long-term care insurance
          • Mental health
          • Pension insurance
          • Riester pension
          • Social self-government
          • Social insurance
          • Accident insurance
          • The future of social security
        • Taxes & Finances
          • Dr. Oliver Perschau
            Dr. Linda Schollenberg

          • Public finances
          • Tax policy
          • Structural change
        • Economy & Society
          • Voluntary standardisation
          • ISWA
          • Names

          • Social justice
          • Social market economy
          • Business and corporate ethics
          • Walter Raymond Foundation
        • Securing skilled workers

          Securing skilled workers


          Click and learn more >>

          Social partnership

          Social partnership



          Click and learn more >>

          Future of social security

          Future of social security



          Click and learn more >>

          Covid 19 information for companies

          Covid 19 information for companies




          Click and learn more >>

  • Newsroom
    • News
    • #Workkeepsusbusy
    • Photos and videos
    • Publications
    • Press Contacts
  • The BDA
    • Organisation
      • Presidium
      • Board of Directors
      • Chief Executive
      • Departments
      • In the network
    • Mission
    • Vision
    • Values
  • Members
    • Our Members
      • State professional associations
      • Federal trade associations
    • Become a member
    • Become a partner
  • DE
  • EN
Arbeitgeberportal

ArbeitgeberPortal

Anmelden
Sie haben noch kein Konto?
Jetzt registrieren

Enhancing employer participation in European standardisation

Enhancing employer participation in European standardisation

Position paper on the planned revision of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 on European standardisation (EU Standardisation Regulation)

May 2026

Summary

The Commission plans to present a proposal for the revision of the EU Standardisation Regulation in the third quarter of 2026. In this proposal, employers must finally be given equal consideration as social partners. The current Regulation explicitly mentions only the workers’ side. Employers should be included in the revised Regulation as representatives of the public interest. Furthermore, it must be clearly stipulated that in-house human resources work does not fall within the scope of service standardisation. It is part of the protected remit of the social partners. Neither management standards nor new standardisation mandates – for example under the AI Regulation – must encroach upon this area. Faster standardisation procedures can strengthen European competitiveness. However, this must not be at the expense of quality, transparency or broad participation of all relevant stakeholders. Simplified procedures, alternative standardisation products or open-call models can restrict participation rights. In doing so, they jeopardise the legitimacy of European standards. The EU needs standards that are based on broad expertise and are socially accepted. The revision of the Standardisation Regulation offers an opportunity to permanently safeguard equality, constitutional principles and the sustainable quality of European standardisation.

 

In detail

Anchor employers as social partners in European standardisation

The EU Standardisation Regulation must recognise employers as social partners. Currently, it mentions only the employee side. This excludes employers from equal participation and contradicts Article 152 TFEU, which protects social partnership. This is particularly evident in recitals 12, 17 and 22, as well as in Article 5 of the Regulation. All these provisions are directed exclusively at employees. This falls short because employers also represent the public interest and must therefore be clearly named in the Regulation. At the same time, European standardisation is increasingly encroaching on in-house human resources management. This applies, for example, to standards on human resource management or occupational health and safety standards. Against this backdrop, employers need a significantly stronger and more established role in European standardisation.

Clearly exclude HR management from the scope of service standardisation

The scope of service standardisation must be clearly defined. It must not include in-house human resources management. In Germany, this is a constitutionally protected area of regulation for the social partners. Neither service standards nor management system standards nor new standardisation mandates must interfere here. This constitutional reality, which is practised in many Member States, should be explicitly enshrined in Recital 12 on products and processes. In addition, it requires clear regulation in a new article of the revised Regulation.

Speeding up standardisation processes – whilst maintaining quality, transparency and participation

Faster standardisation procedures should only be permitted if established principles are upheld. Stricter deadlines and the use of simplified procedures by European and national standardisation organisations must not compromise the quality of standardisation work, nor transparency and participation rights. Accelerated procedures can strengthen the competitiveness of the European standardisation system. Nevertheless, European standards still require broad expert knowledge. They must be accepted by industry, academia and society. Decisions on the duration of the development process – including in so-called fast-track procedures – must therefore remain the responsibility of the standardisation bodies. Control over content and working methods must remain at expert level. Simplified procedures may only be used if key standardisation principles, such as transparency, broad participation and consensus, are fully respected. They are not suitable for changes to the substance of standards, e.g. the adaptation of technical requirements, the introduction of new test steps or the modification of evaluation criteria.

Preserving European standardisation structures and participation rights

The EU should refrain from using alternative standardisation products. This applies, for example, to the European Agile Specification (EAS) from CEN/CENELEC or to products from other organisations that are not recognised as European standardisation organisations within the meaning of the Standardisation Regulation. All these instruments shorten the procedures. In doing so, they weaken the participation rights of societal and social stakeholders. Standardisation products from the Commission outside established structures can circumvent tried-and-tested participation and consensus mechanisms. This reduces both the acceptance and the quality of the results. Standardisation mandates to organisations outside the recognised European standardisation structures should remain the exception. The same applies to the adoption of external standardisation products. Both may only take place within the framework of existing international cooperation mechanisms. These include, in particular, the Vienna and Frankfurt Agreements on the mutual recognition of standards. So-called open-call procedures, i.e. public tenders, should also be viewed critically. They can undermine existing participation rights and nullify established procedures. Standardisation mandates may therefore only be awarded to organisations that reliably adhere to the fundamental European principles of standardisation work. These include inclusivity, transparency, consensus and public consultation. Equally important is the equal participation of the social partners.

 

The complete Position paper is available for download in the right-hand margin.

Contact:

BDA | German Employers
Confederation of German Employers' Associations

EU, International Affairs, Economy
T +49 30 2033-1050
eu@arbeitgeber.de

EU Transparency Register: 7749519702-29

BDA is the central business association organising the social and economic policy interests of the entire German economy. We pool the interests of one million businesses with around 30,5 million employers. These businesses are associated with BDA through voluntary membership of employer associations.


Position paper as PDF

BDA-Position paper: on the planned revision of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 on European standardisation (EU Standardisation Regulation) (May 2026)

AI at work: foster innovation instead of new legislation

Position paper on a possible EU legislative initiative on AI and algorithmic management at work

February 2026
Summary

The EU’s approach to protecting workers in the digital age has created potential challenges in terms of legal clarity and practical implementation, some of which are harmful to European competitiveness and need to be resolved. Therefore, EU Commission President von der Leyen’s announcement to make business easier in the EU and “to simplify, consolidate and codify legislation to eliminate any overlaps and contradictions” is significant. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and algorithmic management (AM) at work is already regulated by too many EU laws, creating a complex legal landscape that employers and workers must navigate.
AI and AM are central to further developing job quality, and they should drive productivity and transformation to safeguard the EU’s technological sovereignty, social model, and competitiveness. Yet current policy developments raise concerns. The EU Commission’s announced “Quality Jobs Act” should not contradict von der Leyen’s promise and hamper the positive effects of AI and AM. Instead, the following principles should be followed:

Europe must become attractive for the use of AI at work to strengthen competitiveness. For that, it is crucial to promote the dissemination of new technologies and to simplify, harmonise, and enforce the existing AI legal framework. Re- and upskilling the workforce and leveraging EU initiatives such as the AI Continent Action Plan are important to navigate an innovation-supporting environment and safeguard European values.

There is no need for further EU regulation on “AI at the workplace.” Instead, priority should be given to the effective deployment of AI and regulatory simplification, including the Digital Omnibus. This simplification is necessary to enable businesses to fully leverage digital technologies for quality jobs.

It is central to enforce the once-only principle regarding existing legislation on AI and AM. AI at work is already extensively regulated – at both EU and national levels. This applies even more to the broader concept of AM at work since it encumbers many long-established labour practices. Numerous duplications in the existing legislation need to be addressed and resolved including the AI Act, Platform Work Directive, General Data Protection Regulation, and occupational health and safety frameworks.

Gold-plating in Member States must be prevented. The AI Office should ensure consistent enforcement and a business-friendly environment.

Collective bargaining by social partners must be strengthened. Collective agreements must take precedence over additional EU legislation, as they can best address national and sectoral needs.

Stay up to date and subscribe to our newsletter.

Subscribe now
Publications
Contact
Privacy policy
Imprint
  • 
  • 

© BDA 2026
Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände

Our commitment to equal opportunities and diversity in the workplace.

Arbeitgeberportal
EN
  • DE
  • EN
  • Wir auf Linkedin
  • Wir auf Instagram
  • Wir auf Youtube

Ihre Ansprechpartnerin (oder Ihr Ansprechpartner):

Name Vorname
Bereich / Abteilung
Telefon: +49 30 2033-1800
E-Mail: v.name@arbeitgeber.de

Ihre Ansprechpartner:

Name Vorname
Bereich / Abteilung
Telefon: +49 30 2033-1800
E-Mail: v.name@arbeitgeber.de
Name Vorname
Bereich / Abteilung
Telefon: +49 30 2033-1800
E-Mail: v.name@arbeitgeber.de

ArbeitgeberPortal

Anmelden
Sie haben noch kein Konto?
Jetzt registrieren

Ihre Ansprechpartnerin:

Ursula Haschen
Teamassistenz | Walter-Raymond-Stiftung / Institut für Sozial- und Wirtschaftspolitische Ausbildung
Team Assistant | Walter Raymond Foundation / Institute of Societal and Social Policy Training

Telefon: +49 30 2033-1950
E-Mail: u.haschen@arbeitgeber.de