It is right to increasingly address the social issues of our time. We employers are behind this. But a social Europe and a social union are not the same thing. Employers are firmly committed to improving social and economic conditions, while respecting national differences. A social union based on an unrealistic and therefore anti-social social policy through directives and regulations is not conducive to moving Europe forward. The different labour market and social systems that have developed historically cannot simply be levelled out.

A social market economy that also combines competitiveness with social balance in the Erhardian sense must also serve as a model for Europe. The foundation of the social summit in Porto - to implement the legally non-binding "European Pillar of Social Rights" through concrete legislation - leads us into a social union. It is frightening how the European Treaties, which establish national competence for social policy, are being overstretched in order to find supposedly suitable legal bases for new EU social policy legislation.

There is a danger that, in our zeal to supposedly improve the economy and society, we will upset well-functioning and established labour market and social models. For example, the German Minimum Wage Commission, which is made up of social partners, would no longer be able to decide as it has done up to now if what European parliamentarians and the Commission are demanding with a view to an EU Minimum Wage Directive comes true. The target of 70 or even 90 per cent collective bargaining coverage proposed at the same time is not only completely impractical, but also contradicts the negative freedom of association: no one in Germany may be forced to join a trade union or employers' association. The unfair alternative of declaring collective agreements generally binding endangers social partnership instead of protecting it. A minimum wage directive with these contents would not be a social policy boon, but an arrogance.

A social Europe accepts the crucial role of the economy for social progress. A social union, on the other hand, naively idealises the possibility of social improvement without an economic basis. This makes it dangerous. For the importance of economic stability has only become clearer in the light of the Covid 19 pandemic: Economic and structural reforms are needed in member states to ensure stability through increased employment and more flexible labor markets. Otherwise, the EUR 750 billion of debt planned for the EU in the course of reconstruction will become ballast for future generations alone, without unleashing any forces for growth. The social summit threatens to send out the wrong signal.

The completion of the internal market also deserves greater focus. The social policy credo must be: both employees and companies benefit from being part of the internal market and from being able to exploit its opportunities. It is and remains Europe's engine for jobs, competitiveness and prosperity. The current Posting of Workers Directive, however, creates new protectionism in the internal market. The intellectual grandchildren of Jacques Delors are in retreat instead of developing opinion leadership.

The EU should aim for a social Europe in which Member States receive the right support to secure social standards and economic growth. It is important to find a new balance between Member State and European ambitions in social policy: Trying to find EU legislative templates acceptable to all Member States in this sensitive area rarely leads to satisfactory results.

When political Europe meets in Porto to discuss the social dimension of the EU, we must address this. Why do we not dare to take the broader political perspective? One thing is obvious: Above all, a strong economy is the basis for a social Europe.

To the article in the FAZ >>